<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Language Politics #13)distinctions within privilege and oppression</title>
	<atom:link href="http://takesupspace.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/language-politics-13distinctions-within-privilege-and-oppression/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://takesupspace.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/language-politics-13distinctions-within-privilege-and-oppression/</link>
	<description>trans misogyny, feminism, and trans activism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:02:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: shiva</title>
		<link>http://takesupspace.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/language-politics-13distinctions-within-privilege-and-oppression/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>shiva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://takesupspace.wordpress.com/?p=94#comment-138</guid>
		<description>I kind of agree with these distinctions, but i&#039;m having trouble getting my head round the ideas of &quot;privilege that everyone should have&quot; and &quot;oppression that everyone should have&quot;, because in my system of definitions, privilege and oppression are things that no one should have, because they shouldn&#039;t exist at all.

Put alternatively, i don&#039;t disagree that support and accountability should apply to everyone - i just don&#039;t think that support should be classified as &quot;privilege&quot; or that accountability should be classified as &quot;oppression&quot;, because i think that kind of muddies the core-for-me concept of fighting for a world where there is neither privilege nor oppression...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kind of agree with these distinctions, but i&#8217;m having trouble getting my head round the ideas of &#8220;privilege that everyone should have&#8221; and &#8220;oppression that everyone should have&#8221;, because in my system of definitions, privilege and oppression are things that no one should have, because they shouldn&#8217;t exist at all.</p>
<p>Put alternatively, i don&#8217;t disagree that support and accountability should apply to everyone &#8211; i just don&#8217;t think that support should be classified as &#8220;privilege&#8221; or that accountability should be classified as &#8220;oppression&#8221;, because i think that kind of muddies the core-for-me concept of fighting for a world where there is neither privilege nor oppression&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
